DevSecOps and traditional DevOps

Categories : Uncategorized

Author : vivekkumarp Date : Apr 24, 2025

Comparison between DevSecOps and traditional DevOps 

DevOps has enabled organizations to streamline software delivery pipelines quickly and efficiently by fostering close collaboration between development and operations teams. DevOps has empowered organizations to quickly respond to marketplace needs by automating workflows, improving collaboration and communication, and removing silos. With the acceleration of delivery speed comes the increased potential of security risks. As data breaches and cyberattacks, both significant, have become common, organizations would benefit from not treating security as a separate downstream activity. 

With this increasing need for “security by design,” the development of DevSecOps has evolved, which sets the premise that security is embedded into every phase of the software development lifecycle. Unlike DevOps, which prioritizes speed and efficiency with security as the final consideration, DevSecOps recognizes that security cannot simply be a single authority. It emphasizes early threat detection, continuous risk assessment, and considers security a common shared responsibility and as a continuous improvement lifecycle activity, via CI/CD (Continuous Integration/ Continuous Delivery) pipelines. 

Category DevOps DevSecOps 
Definition A collection of methods that merge software development (Dev) with IT operations (Ops) to reduce development times and facilitate continuous delivery. An advancement of DevOps that incorporates security (Sec) in all stages of the software development lifecycle (SDLC). 
Primary Focus Rapid delivery, automation, and teamwork between development and operations.  Rapid delivery, automation, and teamwork with built-in and ongoing security. 
Security Role Security is often introduced at the end of the SDLC or handled by a separate team. Security is built into each stage of the SDLC and shared by all teams. 
Team Structure Developers and operations teams work closely together. Security teams are usually siloed. Developers, operations, and security teams work as a unified team with shared responsibility. 
Security Integration Manual security testing is done post-development or during pre-release phases. Automated security checks (SAST, DAST, dependency scanning, etc.) are integrated into CI/CD pipelines. 
Development Cycle Emphasis on faster release cycles and rapid deployment. Emphasis on secure, fast, and reliable releases through continuous testing and threat monitoring. 
Tooling Focuses on automation, CI/CD tools, infrastructure provisioning, and containerization. Uses the same DevOps tools plus security tools like Snyk, SonarQube, OWASP ZAP, HashiCorp Vault, etc. 
Risk Management Higher risk of discovering vulnerabilities late in the cycle, which increases fix costs. Early detection and remediation of vulnerabilities reduce risk and cost. 
Compliance Readiness May not fully align with regulatory requirements without additional steps. Encourages compliance by embedding policies, access control, and audit trails into development processes. 
Feedback Loop Fast but can overlook security-related insights. Secure and fast, includes security-related feedback for continuous improvement. 
Use Cases Suitable for startups, MVPs, and organizations focused primarily on delivery speed. Best for businesses handling sensitive data or operating in regulated industries (e.g., healthcare, finance, government). 

SAST – Static Application Security Testing 

DAST – Dynamic Application Security Testing 

Challenges in Adopting DevSecOps 

Skills Gap and Lack of Security Awareness: Upskilling teams through workshops, certifications, and hands-on training is critical to ensuring that everyone involved has a working knowledge of secure coding, automated testing, and threat modeling. 

Excessive Tool Use and Integration Challenges: The DevSecOps landscape comprises numerous tools for activities such as static analysis, dynamic testing, dependency scanning, and secrets management, among others. Companies must take a strategic approach when choosing tools and prioritize platforms that provide effortless integration and centralized oversight. 

Balancing Speed with Security: Overly aggressive security checks or poorly optimized tools can slow down build and deployment times. Finding the right balance requires tuning tools, automating intelligently, and establishing risk-based security thresholds that align with business priorities. 

When to Choose DevSecOps Over Traditional DevOps 

  • While handling sensitive or regulated data 
  • When operating in high-risk or regulated industries 
  • When building cloud-native or microservices-based applications 
  • When scaling teams or deployments rapidly 
  • When recovering from a security breach 
  • When you prioritize long-term software resilience 

Conclusion 

DevSecOps has emerged as a crucial framework for organizations that prioritize secure software development while maintaining efficiency. By integrating security throughout the software development life cycle, DevSecOps allows development teams to address vulnerabilities proactively during both development and production phases through patching, rather than merely generating vulnerability reports post-deployment. As a result, applications developed using DevSecOps tend to be more dependable, with lower risks and increased assurance regarding the quality of the software delivered. 

Given the increasingly sophisticated and intricate nature of security threats, relying solely on end-of-development security testing is inadequate. Security cannot simply be an afterthought. DevSecOps enables teams to incorporate security practices into the SDLC life cycle and the continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline, but effective collaboration among development, operations, and security is crucial. Shared commitment and responsibility make it easier to meet compliance standards and foster trust and confidence among users. 

Contact Us